"In 1995, President Bill Clinton announced an initiative to boost homeownership
of families by, and one component raised the affordable
housing goals at the GSEs. Between almost 2.8 million households
entered the ranks of homeowners, nearly twice as many as in the previous two years.
“But we have to do a lot better,” Clinton said. “This is the new way home for the
American middle class. We have got to raise incomes in this country. We have got to
increase security for people who are doing the right thing, and we have got to make
people believe that they can have some permanence and stability in their lives even as
they deal with all the changing forces that are out there in this global economy.” The
push to expand homeownership continued under President George W. Bush, who,
for example, introduced a “Zero Down Payment Initiative” that under certain circumstances could remove the down payment rule for first-time home buyers with
FHA-insured mortgages.
In describing the GSEs’ affordable housing loans, Andrew Cuomo, secretary of
Housing and Urban Development and now governor of New
York, told the FCIC, “Affordability means many things. There were moderate income
loans."
If you still don't Get it, Congress invested mortgage-backed securities and thus they pass laws in order to protect their investment, It really assists that simple, why do you think that during this whole financial crisis, only one person went to jail, yet the federal government through the Atty. Gen.'s of every state filed a complete against the banks, which they pled guilty to fraud, no one was reimbursed as a result of the fraud?
The law is
The Constitution for the United States,
and the Constitution of the State in
which the property resides.
“The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States of America.[3] It superseded the Articles of Confederation, the nation's first constitution, in 1789. Originally comprising seven articles, it delineates the national frame of government. Its first three articles embody the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress (Article I); the executive, consisting of the president and subordinate officers (Article II); and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts (Article III). Article IV, Article V, and Article VI embody concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments, the states in relationship to the federal government, and the shared process of constitutional amendment. Article VII establishes the procedure subsequently used by the 13 States to ratify it. It is regarded as the oldest written and codified national constitution in force..”
Am I supposed to
pay taxes on my
private property?
The answer is, it depends:
“No one may be forced to pay taxes on their private property that is for personal use, household use, not for profit and or for gain commercially.”
Under the right to property clause, no one may be taxed on their private property, especially if said property is there homestead i.e. primary residence. The courts have recognized this, and Congress has recognized this to be a inalienable right to property.
Each state government has a form known as the "usage tax exemption form" some states it is referred to as the cell tax exemption form. All one need to his contact the County assessor's office and/or the state tax licensing Board for a copy of the current form, you may have to do an amendment to the form, and attach a copy of an affidavit statement, documenting that the property thus affected is your primary residence, your homestead, and is not for commercial use and/or gain, and is exempt in every state by their adopting the Uniform Commercial Code article 9 section 102 and 109.
If my property was
in fact already
considered, why
am I being asked
to make monthly
payments?
That is a very good question,
“You are being asked to make monthly payments, because status with the document entitled the deed of trust stipulates. You are making monthly payments because you have never corrected the record. That is precisely what this organization does, it assist you were correcting the record, as well as being compensated for the past several years of payments beyond what the law allows, we do however take a 50% contingency fee respecting the back payments for the past 5 years. This fee is necessary so as to have kept the cost of affordable for the services being provided, and the staff and The considerable resources that have gone into putting the program together.”
And before it is asked, if you have not paid rent in the past 3 years, and are not yet in foreclosure, is it still 50% for the past 5 years or is it 50% for the past 5 years of payments? The answer is, 50% of any recoupment for the previous 5 years, and not beyond the 5th year. Yes we know there was a moratorium, but why would we penalize you by asking for more than what's reasonable?
We live in a society where everyone is afraid to go to court, not because they are terrified of a judge, but there terrified of losing. Please note that we get it, that it's a very nervous situation, but we provide and help you prepare all the documentation to support your position, something that you would not have had otherwise.
Keep in mind if your documents are well-kept and well-organized, you shouldn't have to say a word in court, all you have to do us present the documents and then refer to the documents when the conversation arises, what could be more difficult than that?
We have already thought of these things in advance, this is why we provide you with tthe documentation that answers to those questions in advance, you will have an outline of the documentation so that you could quickly refer that judicial officer to the information. And keep in mind, even though the other party will have an attorney who will make it appear that they no more than you and/or better at this thing you are, you will have documentation that they cannot refute, so it won't matter how much experience they have, because they will not be able to overcome the evidence that's presented.